— Мам, ты не поймёшь! Знаете так многозначительно и с закатыванием глаз 🙄 Чтоооо? Где моя малышка? Я же носила её под сердцем совсем недавно, а кажется скоро нужно будет стучаться, чтобы зайти в её комнату… По такому случаю понастальгировала в семейном архиве 💔
А ещё не знаю актуальна ли кому-то эта рубрика, но мне крайне важно систематизировать свои труды! Поэтому понастольгируем немного по ноябрю🍂
— Мам, ты не поймёшь! Знаете так многозначительно и с закатыванием глаз 🙄 Чтоооо? Где моя малышка? Я же носила её под сердцем совсем недавно, а кажется скоро нужно будет стучаться, чтобы зайти в её комнату… По такому случаю понастальгировала в семейном архиве 💔
А ещё не знаю актуальна ли кому-то эта рубрика, но мне крайне важно систематизировать свои труды! Поэтому понастольгируем немного по ноябрю🍂
"And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from ua
