С хулиганством бороться, конечно, необходимо, но как быть со статьей 147 УК РФ "Нарушение неприкосновенности частной жизни"? А с учетом того, как у нас обеспечена сохранность персональных данных, где гарантия, что фото и видео "борьбы с хулиганством" не появятся на педофильских сайтах?
С хулиганством бороться, конечно, необходимо, но как быть со статьей 147 УК РФ "Нарушение неприкосновенности частной жизни"? А с учетом того, как у нас обеспечена сохранность персональных данных, где гарантия, что фото и видео "борьбы с хулиганством" не появятся на педофильских сайтах?
Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals.
from ua
