🏴По мотивам доклада откооператива Molotov на нашей секции был подготовлен материал для проекта Дискурс! Для нас это очень радостная новость, поэтому хотим порадовать и вас:
🏴По мотивам доклада откооператива Molotov на нашей секции был подготовлен материал для проекта Дискурс! Для нас это очень радостная новость, поэтому хотим порадовать и вас:
BY Современные либертарные теории и практики
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups.
from ua
