Подмосковные высшие чиновники "держат марку" середняков - ни Ильдар Габдрахманов, ни Александр Чупраков не смогли в феврале сделать социально-экономическую и внутриполитическую обстановку в Московской области лучше.
Полагаем, для председателя правительства подстоличного региона и руководителя администрации губернатора области такие показатели можно назвать неудовлетворительными - пока губернатор пытается во всеуслышанье заявлять о лидерстве Подмосковья, эксперты в очередной раз констатируют пессимистичный застой.
Подмосковные высшие чиновники "держат марку" середняков - ни Ильдар Габдрахманов, ни Александр Чупраков не смогли в феврале сделать социально-экономическую и внутриполитическую обстановку в Московской области лучше.
Полагаем, для председателя правительства подстоличного региона и руководителя администрации губернатора области такие показатели можно назвать неудовлетворительными - пока губернатор пытается во всеуслышанье заявлять о лидерстве Подмосковья, эксперты в очередной раз констатируют пессимистичный застой.
BY Замгубернатора
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai.
from ua
