По случаю находок в процессе сегодняшнего скручивания генпродюсера телеграм-канала «KION» санитарами в погонах… вспомнилась одна история. Была инфа-сотка, стала – двухсотка. Читайте правильные каналы, и всё узнаете раньше всех.
По случаю находок в процессе сегодняшнего скручивания генпродюсера телеграм-канала «KION» санитарами в погонах… вспомнилась одна история. Была инфа-сотка, стала – двухсотка. Читайте правильные каналы, и всё узнаете раньше всех.
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from ua
