Посмотрели на Ивана Урганта в одном из юмористических интернет-шоу. Бывшую звезду Первого туда пригласили в качестве гостя. На шесть минут нас хватило. Все эти ужимки, глазки, бровки, паузки, как оказалось, совершенно никакие без услужливо смеющегося зала и восторгов дурачков соведущих. Жалкое и очень унылое зрелище.
Посмотрели на Ивана Урганта в одном из юмористических интернет-шоу. Бывшую звезду Первого туда пригласили в качестве гостя. На шесть минут нас хватило. Все эти ужимки, глазки, бровки, паузки, как оказалось, совершенно никакие без услужливо смеющегося зала и восторгов дурачков соведущих. Жалкое и очень унылое зрелище.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever."
from ua
