грустненькая история: музыкальное издание Fact завершило свою серию миксов - последний, 940-й по счету микс вышел неделю назад и был подготовлен канадским проектом Tati au Miel.
новым миксом была поставлена точка на текущем формате этого музыкального проекта, хоть журнал и пообещал предоставлять площадку и начинающим, и состоявшимся музыкантам дальше.
грустненькая история: музыкальное издание Fact завершило свою серию миксов - последний, 940-й по счету микс вышел неделю назад и был подготовлен канадским проектом Tati au Miel.
новым миксом была поставлена точка на текущем формате этого музыкального проекта, хоть журнал и пообещал предоставлять площадку и начинающим, и состоявшимся музыкантам дальше.
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from ua
