الحِكمة سِمة ظاهرة على صاحبها فاصبِر وتروَّى ولا تكنْ صدى لكلِّ صوت وناظِر مَن حولك بِعين تريد رؤية الحقِّ ونصرته عندها سترى صاحبَ الحكمة فاتَّبعه فقد أوتيَ خيرا كثيرا وليكن لك نصيب مِن حكمته
الحِكمة سِمة ظاهرة على صاحبها فاصبِر وتروَّى ولا تكنْ صدى لكلِّ صوت وناظِر مَن حولك بِعين تريد رؤية الحقِّ ونصرته عندها سترى صاحبَ الحكمة فاتَّبعه فقد أوتيَ خيرا كثيرا وليكن لك نصيب مِن حكمته
BY أثر الندىٰ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ua
