инструментальный дарк-фолк-дуэт волынщика и барабанщика под именем Tabernis тоже любит этот мистический брейгелевский образ пасечника — музыканты выступают в таких же средневековых пчеловодных костюмах, записывают лайвы в лесу и дают тематические названия своим трекам. вот этот, например, называется «танец улья».
инструментальный дарк-фолк-дуэт волынщика и барабанщика под именем Tabernis тоже любит этот мистический брейгелевский образ пасечника — музыканты выступают в таких же средневековых пчеловодных костюмах, записывают лайвы в лесу и дают тематические названия своим трекам. вот этот, например, называется «танец улья».
BY насекомость
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from ua
