🇷🇺 Известный украинский блогер записал короткий видос с критикой мунафиков.
В своем видео Алексей Шевцов довольно доходчиво объяснил, почему мунафики, так яро ведущие свою пропаганду через социальные сети, являются лицемерами и нарушают правила собственной религии.
Сам собой, что его ролик не заставит ни одного мусульманина задуматься и причина не только в том, что они блогера не смотрят. Основная причина в слове "задуматься".
Прочую деятельность Шевцова не одобряем, - прим. ред.
🇷🇺 Известный украинский блогер записал короткий видос с критикой мунафиков.
В своем видео Алексей Шевцов довольно доходчиво объяснил, почему мунафики, так яро ведущие свою пропаганду через социальные сети, являются лицемерами и нарушают правила собственной религии.
Сам собой, что его ролик не заставит ни одного мусульманина задуматься и причина не только в том, что они блогера не смотрят. Основная причина в слове "задуматься".
Прочую деятельность Шевцова не одобряем, - прим. ред.
BY О.К.О.
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion.
from ua
