Останин-Головня В.Д. Положение шиитского меньшинства Саудовской Аравии на современном этапе // Россия и мусульманский мир. – 2024. – № 3 (333). – С. 62–73.
Останин-Головня В.Д. Положение шиитского меньшинства Саудовской Аравии на современном этапе // Россия и мусульманский мир. – 2024. – № 3 (333). – С. 62–73.
BY ОБПВ ИНИОН РАН
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from ua
