Дорогие друзья, сегодня состоялась пресс-конференция в ТАСС, посвященная созданию Национального правозащитного комитета. Который в дальнейшем станет правозащитной организацией на базе БРИКС. Инициатива была поддержана нашим президентом.
Дорогие друзья, сегодня состоялась пресс-конференция в ТАСС, посвященная созданию Национального правозащитного комитета. Который в дальнейшем станет правозащитной организацией на базе БРИКС. Инициатива была поддержана нашим президентом.
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report.
from ua
