Не отменять проверку в Шереметьево а ужесточать максимально. Без проверки уже проникло столько агентуры, что жуть. А в интернете агентура влияния себя вообще вольготно чувствует. а как на них пальцем указывают, так они поднимают визг, что их "проукраинская сеточка" травит, да всяким депутатам жалуются. 🤦🤦🤦 https://www.group-telegram.com/matkotya/13528
Не отменять проверку в Шереметьево а ужесточать максимально. Без проверки уже проникло столько агентуры, что жуть. А в интернете агентура влияния себя вообще вольготно чувствует. а как на них пальцем указывают, так они поднимают визг, что их "проукраинская сеточка" травит, да всяким депутатам жалуются. 🤦🤦🤦 https://www.group-telegram.com/matkotya/13528
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 230 points, or 0.7%. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.3% and 2.2%, respectively. All three indexes began the day with gains before selling off. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from ua
