Почему-то мне кажется, что Рамзан Кадыров на деле и в пафосе своём больше унитарист, чем федералист. А игроки в федерацию это оккупанты, баскаки, паразиты, больше желающие жрать чужое, чем развивать своё.
Почему-то мне кажется, что Рамзан Кадыров на деле и в пафосе своём больше унитарист, чем федералист. А игроки в федерацию это оккупанты, баскаки, паразиты, больше желающие жрать чужое, чем развивать своё.
BY Плавильный котёл
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat.
from ua
