Всё, Маск наложил лапу на гражданскую и военную связь на Украине. Если Трамп даст команду - "обесточит" и "положит" связь в ВСУ: ни интернет - телефонии, ни сотовой не будет. ... https://www.group-telegram.com/ejdailyru/292604 (не знаю, писать, что это бывший иноагент Бриф или нет, но коллеги из канала подскажут, если что или из РКН, мы же законопослушные).
Всё, Маск наложил лапу на гражданскую и военную связь на Украине. Если Трамп даст команду - "обесточит" и "положит" связь в ВСУ: ни интернет - телефонии, ни сотовой не будет. ... https://www.group-telegram.com/ejdailyru/292604 (не знаю, писать, что это бывший иноагент Бриф или нет, но коллеги из канала подскажут, если что или из РКН, мы же законопослушные).
BY Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Sebi said data, emails and other documents are being retrieved from the seized devices and detailed investigation is in progress. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from ua
