хвостики вже у Дніпрі, на днях їх мають забрати, і скинути мені фотки, як тільки буду мати фото, закину все у паблік.Прошу вибачення, що виходить так довго зі звітом.За їх доставку заплатив з переадресацією на Дніпро 216грн, скірн кину у коментарі до посту.
Якщо у когось буде бажання самим підтримати якийсь підрозділ хвостами на воги, можете написати в коментарі, я відпишу вам у особисті, і допоможу з тим, щоб ви їх придбали, та передали.
хвостики вже у Дніпрі, на днях їх мають забрати, і скинути мені фотки, як тільки буду мати фото, закину все у паблік.Прошу вибачення, що виходить так довго зі звітом.За їх доставку заплатив з переадресацією на Дніпро 216грн, скірн кину у коментарі до посту.
Якщо у когось буде бажання самим підтримати якийсь підрозділ хвостами на воги, можете написати в коментарі, я відпишу вам у особисті, і допоможу з тим, щоб ви їх придбали, та передали.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from ua
