Страна крайне неуверенно стартует на Озерной. Выкатили вчера прайс, начали накидывать по дополнительному мульту. Что там за спрос должен быть такой, чтобы накинуть по мульту на несчастную евро двушку - неизвестно. Тот случай, когда динамическое ценообразование - слишком динамическое.
Сейчас средний прайс на прилавке - 358 тыс. руб,/кв. м. с учетом того, что соседи из ПИКа даже на уровень 300 выйти не могут. Ну, все так и запишем - крутой продукт наворачивает цену на 20%🤣
Страна крайне неуверенно стартует на Озерной. Выкатили вчера прайс, начали накидывать по дополнительному мульту. Что там за спрос должен быть такой, чтобы накинуть по мульту на несчастную евро двушку - неизвестно. Тот случай, когда динамическое ценообразование - слишком динамическое.
Сейчас средний прайс на прилавке - 358 тыс. руб,/кв. м. с учетом того, что соседи из ПИКа даже на уровень 300 выйти не могут. Ну, все так и запишем - крутой продукт наворачивает цену на 20%🤣
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news.
from ua
