Military struggle against Putin's regime takes a lot of resources, and not the last - money - for equipment, for security travel costs, for gasoline and ammonium fertilizers ;-)
And for the small groups it can be too much. R.A.F. is here to help. But for this R.A.F. needs your help:)
Our wallets: BTC: bc1qtnw6p89xk7xnsvzdktv79zhpv2m834pp5sfyg0 (segwit) and 1PZMFedC1sQghHghh47mRXiQpTQjafsvmD (no-segwit)
Military struggle against Putin's regime takes a lot of resources, and not the last - money - for equipment, for security travel costs, for gasoline and ammonium fertilizers ;-)
And for the small groups it can be too much. R.A.F. is here to help. But for this R.A.F. needs your help:)
Our wallets: BTC: bc1qtnw6p89xk7xnsvzdktv79zhpv2m834pp5sfyg0 (segwit) and 1PZMFedC1sQghHghh47mRXiQpTQjafsvmD (no-segwit)
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 230 points, or 0.7%. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.3% and 2.2%, respectively. All three indexes began the day with gains before selling off. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ua
