Почему, кстати, «околоправые» тг-каналы (иногда это анонимы, иногда люди с бэкграундом из 90-00-хх) занимаются тем же, что и заграничные либералы - критикой происходящего? Вместо консолидации друг с другом в децентрализованную сеть медиа, где формировалось бы альтернативная позиция по устройству ПРБ?
Почему, кстати, «околоправые» тг-каналы (иногда это анонимы, иногда люди с бэкграундом из 90-00-хх) занимаются тем же, что и заграничные либералы - критикой происходящего? Вместо консолидации друг с другом в децентрализованную сеть медиа, где формировалось бы альтернативная позиция по устройству ПРБ?
BY SUS SCROFA
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"The result is on this photo: fiery 'greetings' to the invaders," the Security Service of Ukraine wrote alongside a photo showing several military vehicles among plumes of black smoke. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from ua
