The 25th Amendment can be applied retroactively, you know.
Trump DID say the 25th Amendment was no threat to him…but it WOULD end up haunting Joe Biden.
If a company President is demented, and his staff is revealed to have been hiding this while they ran the company themselves for their own benefit using him as a figurehead…legally how do any of the ACTIONS taken by the staff survive a legal challenge in court?
Remember: it’s already in the official federal record from a special council named Robert Hur that Joe Biden is suffering from dementia and Hur knew that almost 2 years ago when he interviewed Biden over the classified documents found at his house.
The 25th Amendment can be applied retroactively, you know.
Trump DID say the 25th Amendment was no threat to him…but it WOULD end up haunting Joe Biden.
If a company President is demented, and his staff is revealed to have been hiding this while they ran the company themselves for their own benefit using him as a figurehead…legally how do any of the ACTIONS taken by the staff survive a legal challenge in court?
Remember: it’s already in the official federal record from a special council named Robert Hur that Joe Biden is suffering from dementia and Hur knew that almost 2 years ago when he interviewed Biden over the classified documents found at his house.
These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 230 points, or 0.7%. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.3% and 2.2%, respectively. All three indexes began the day with gains before selling off. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from ua
