Это не зумеры выходили поддерживать кретина Лешу Навального ради кредитного форда фокус из-за американо подобного ебальника у Леши.
Не зумеры.
Миллениалы.
Живите и несите грехи своего поколения на рукавах.
Вы ответствены за попытку мятежа против величия России. Не я и не мои ровесники, пусть некоторые из них заработали свои первые серьёзные деньги в момент когда Люба Соболь облажалась и они в свои 17-18 разгребали долги Любы Соболь.
Это не зумеры выходили поддерживать кретина Лешу Навального ради кредитного форда фокус из-за американо подобного ебальника у Леши.
Не зумеры.
Миллениалы.
Живите и несите грехи своего поколения на рукавах.
Вы ответствены за попытку мятежа против величия России. Не я и не мои ровесники, пусть некоторые из них заработали свои первые серьёзные деньги в момент когда Люба Соболь облажалась и они в свои 17-18 разгребали долги Любы Соболь.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ua
