⚡️Россия даст «более мощный ответ» на удары американскими и британскими ракетами по военным объектам в Курской и Брянской областях, заявил спикер Госдумы Вячеслав Володин.
По его словам, разрешение США и их союзников Киеву применять дальнобойное оружие подтверждает, что против России воюет НАТО.
⚡️Россия даст «более мощный ответ» на удары американскими и британскими ракетами по военным объектам в Курской и Брянской областях, заявил спикер Госдумы Вячеслав Володин.
По его словам, разрешение США и их союзников Киеву применять дальнобойное оружие подтверждает, что против России воюет НАТО.
BY АГИТПРОП
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
There was another possible development: Reuters also reported that Ukraine said that Belarus could soon join the invasion of Ukraine. However, the AFP, citing a Pentagon official, said the U.S. hasn’t yet seen evidence that Belarusian troops are in Ukraine. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Stocks closed in the red Friday as investors weighed upbeat remarks from Russian President Vladimir Putin about diplomatic discussions with Ukraine against a weaker-than-expected print on U.S. consumer sentiment. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
