Арман Татоян и экс-госминистр Арцаха Артак Бегларян обсудили в Париже с депутатами НС и членами Сената Франции вопросы возвращения арцахцев и освобождения армянских пленных
Встречи прошли при поддержке комитета «Ай Дат» Франции.
Татоян и Бегларян встретились с депутатом Национального собрания Изабель Сантьяго, председателем группы армяно-французской дружбы Сената Жильбером-Люком Девиназом, сенатором Валери Бойе и другими законодателями.
Арман Татоян и экс-госминистр Арцаха Артак Бегларян обсудили в Париже с депутатами НС и членами Сената Франции вопросы возвращения арцахцев и освобождения армянских пленных
Встречи прошли при поддержке комитета «Ай Дат» Франции.
Татоян и Бегларян встретились с депутатом Национального собрания Изабель Сантьяго, председателем группы армяно-французской дружбы Сената Жильбером-Люком Девиназом, сенатором Валери Бойе и другими законодателями.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
