^ same goes for universalists, platonists, perrenialists, evolians etc. The only major difference is that they don’t vandalize temples and openly oppose Paganism. The enemy on the inside is way worse though. Some have pointed out the convenience of universalists jumping the Pagan bandwagon just when it picked up real speed. It’s likely that their revisionist movement was organized by the powers that be to derail Paganism back into universalism of christianity. From using heretical teachings of first atheists such as socrates to promoting the common Indo-Afro-Euopean nature of traditional faith, universalism is poison and will hopefully be soon seen as a crime once again.
^ same goes for universalists, platonists, perrenialists, evolians etc. The only major difference is that they don’t vandalize temples and openly oppose Paganism. The enemy on the inside is way worse though. Some have pointed out the convenience of universalists jumping the Pagan bandwagon just when it picked up real speed. It’s likely that their revisionist movement was organized by the powers that be to derail Paganism back into universalism of christianity. From using heretical teachings of first atheists such as socrates to promoting the common Indo-Afro-Euopean nature of traditional faith, universalism is poison and will hopefully be soon seen as a crime once again.
BY Volkish Aryan Pagan
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Telegram was co-founded by Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the brothers who had previously created VKontakte. VK is Russia’s equivalent of Facebook, a social network used for public and private messaging, audio and video sharing as well as online gaming. In January, SimpleWeb reported that VK was Russia’s fourth most-visited website, after Yandex, YouTube and Google’s Russian-language homepage. In 2016, Forbes’ Michael Solomon described Pavel Durov (pictured, below) as the “Mark Zuckerberg of Russia.” Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from us
