Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 14527 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Chief’s Livery and Tack Emporium | Telegram Webview: DidntReal/13824 -
📱 Elon Musk's X (Twitter) deleted the X account of the Magdeburg terrorist, then reinstated it but it came with a catch:
All of the posts made by the Magdeburg terrorist in which he expressed support for Israel bombing Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, all of the posts expressing support for the Israeli premier, Benjamin Netanyahu and the terrorist's praise for Elon Musk and the AfD, were wiped out from the site.
Elon Musk also erroneously continues to claim that the Magdeburg terrorist was motivated by "adherence to islam" when in his own words, he said he is atheist and hates islamic countries and attacked a Christmas market because he thought Germany was too lenient and friendly with islamic countries.
Now, Elon Musk and various orbiter accounts on X are trying to paint the Magdeburg terrorist as "motivated by Islam" and accuse legacy media of "lying" when correctly assessing that he was not an adherent of islam.
📱 Elon Musk's X (Twitter) deleted the X account of the Magdeburg terrorist, then reinstated it but it came with a catch:
All of the posts made by the Magdeburg terrorist in which he expressed support for Israel bombing Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, all of the posts expressing support for the Israeli premier, Benjamin Netanyahu and the terrorist's praise for Elon Musk and the AfD, were wiped out from the site.
Elon Musk also erroneously continues to claim that the Magdeburg terrorist was motivated by "adherence to islam" when in his own words, he said he is atheist and hates islamic countries and attacked a Christmas market because he thought Germany was too lenient and friendly with islamic countries.
Now, Elon Musk and various orbiter accounts on X are trying to paint the Magdeburg terrorist as "motivated by Islam" and accuse legacy media of "lying" when correctly assessing that he was not an adherent of islam.
DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels.
from us
