В преддверии Дня Победы приняли еще одно важное решение: определили, что единовременно выплатим по 250 тысяч рублей всем участникам Великой Отечественной войны. Их у нас в Омской области сейчас проживает 79 человек.
Это решение было поддержано Полномочным представителем Президента России в Сибирском федеральном округе Анатолием Анатольевичем Серышевым.
В преддверии Дня Победы приняли еще одно важное решение: определили, что единовременно выплатим по 250 тысяч рублей всем участникам Великой Отечественной войны. Их у нас в Омской области сейчас проживает 79 человек.
Это решение было поддержано Полномочным представителем Президента России в Сибирском федеральном округе Анатолием Анатольевичем Серышевым.
BY Хоценко о важном
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read."
from us
