🔸Ак Барс Банк снова повышает комиссии за SWIFT Последняя версия тарифов по валютным переводам просуществовала всего неделю - с 25 июля новое ухудшение SWIFT - тариф:
●USD: 2% min $150 max $500 - было 1,2% min $25 max $250 ● EUR и другие валюты: 3% min €200 max €750 - было 2% min €100 max €300 минимальная сумма перевода в евро - €3000 ● GBP, CHF, AED и TRY - без изменений
🔸Ак Барс Банк снова повышает комиссии за SWIFT Последняя версия тарифов по валютным переводам просуществовала всего неделю - с 25 июля новое ухудшение SWIFT - тариф:
●USD: 2% min $150 max $500 - было 1,2% min $25 max $250 ● EUR и другие валюты: 3% min €200 max €750 - было 2% min €100 max €300 минимальная сумма перевода в евро - €3000 ● GBP, CHF, AED и TRY - без изменений
The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report.
from us
