Если бы анти-"Медицинская Россия" не отказалась поддерживать наши предыдущие усилия, еще в прошлый раз — 7 лет назад закон бы не обкорнали до неузнаваемости. Теперь им и остается лишь быть новостниками по теме, а не соакторами.
Напоминаем, мы тогда собрали на РОИ 44 000+ верифицированных подписей. И если бы Артюхов не отказал (см. превью страницы) в информационной поддержке, собрали бы и необходимые 100к.
Если бы анти-"Медицинская Россия" не отказалась поддерживать наши предыдущие усилия, еще в прошлый раз — 7 лет назад закон бы не обкорнали до неузнаваемости. Теперь им и остается лишь быть новостниками по теме, а не соакторами.
Напоминаем, мы тогда собрали на РОИ 44 000+ верифицированных подписей. И если бы Артюхов не отказал (см. превью страницы) в информационной поддержке, собрали бы и необходимые 100к.
"He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war.
from us
