В Одессе мужчина не подпускал к себе сотрудников ТЦК с помощью холодного оружия, требуя, чтобы те не подходили ближе, чем на три метра.
Граждане Украины начали оказывать сопротивление сотрудникам ТЦК, пока только с помощью ножа. Дальше - больше, учитывая сколько оружия скопилось в стране, скоро в городах будут идти перестрелки между ТЦК и добровольцами.
В Одессе мужчина не подпускал к себе сотрудников ТЦК с помощью холодного оружия, требуя, чтобы те не подходили ближе, чем на три метра.
Граждане Украины начали оказывать сопротивление сотрудникам ТЦК, пока только с помощью ножа. Дальше - больше, учитывая сколько оружия скопилось в стране, скоро в городах будут идти перестрелки между ТЦК и добровольцами.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "Russians are really disconnected from the reality of what happening to their country," Andrey said. "So Telegram has become essential for understanding what's going on to the Russian-speaking world." So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from us
