πβ¦unsere π₯MEDIEN, stΓ€ndig hΓΆrt man βdie rechtspopulistische π΅AfDβ. Sagt irgendjemand βdie pΓ€dophilen π’GRΓNENβ oder die βverfassungs- feindliche β«οΈCDUβ?π π£BQQMSπ£ https://www.group-telegram.com/us/TiQToQBQQms.com
πβ¦unsere π₯MEDIEN, stΓ€ndig hΓΆrt man βdie rechtspopulistische π΅AfDβ. Sagt irgendjemand βdie pΓ€dophilen π’GRΓNENβ oder die βverfassungs- feindliche β«οΈCDUβ?π π£BQQMSπ£ https://www.group-telegram.com/us/TiQToQBQQms.com
BY π£πππ πππ ππππππ£
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel β which followers can join but not reply to β means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Such instructions could actually endanger people β citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again β without hesitation." So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, itβs always in relation to something bad. What gives? Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough
from us
