23700р- оплатили полуавтоматический сварочный аппарат для работы на установочной площадке. 7500 р. - заправка 3-х баллонов газовой смесью для сварки (перевод через СБП)
🌸 "Время раскачивать лодку есть только у того, кто не гребёт". А мы грибëм все. И за это вам спасибо! Все вместе выгребем!✊
23700р- оплатили полуавтоматический сварочный аппарат для работы на установочной площадке. 7500 р. - заправка 3-х баллонов газовой смесью для сварки (перевод через СБП)
🌸 "Время раскачивать лодку есть только у того, кто не гребёт". А мы грибëм все. И за это вам спасибо! Все вместе выгребем!✊
These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said.
from us
