Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/Voenkor_PB/-33014-33015-33014-): Failed to open stream: No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Военкор Белый | Telegram Webview: Voenkor_PB/33014 -
❗️Кадры из Суджи Курской области, куда ВСУ намеренно ударили боеприпасами по нашим гражданским, минутами ранее моменты удара, по мониторинговым каналам было объявлена ракетная опасность Курская область и Суджа, наша🇷🇺 авиция там в этот момент не работала в тех направлениях, хохлы сообщают что предворительно под завалами могут находится около сотни людей. 🚀Военкор ПБ. 🗣Написать нам новость
❗️Кадры из Суджи Курской области, куда ВСУ намеренно ударили боеприпасами по нашим гражданским, минутами ранее моменты удара, по мониторинговым каналам было объявлена ракетная опасность Курская область и Суджа, наша🇷🇺 авиция там в этот момент не работала в тех направлениях, хохлы сообщают что предворительно под завалами могут находится около сотни людей. 🚀Военкор ПБ. 🗣Написать нам новость
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Now safely in France with his spouse and three of his children, Kliuchnikov scrolls through Telegram to learn about the devastation happening in his home country. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from us
