Алтайским коммунальщикам перестали платить зарплату Следственное управление СКР по Алтайскому краю совместно с краевой прокуратурой инициировало проверку по информации, размещенной в СМИ, о том, что на предприятии "Жилкомсервис" в Поспелихинском районе два месяца не выплачивается заработная плата сотрудникам. ЧИТАТЬ ДАЛЕЕ В ИСТОЧНИКЕ https://www.group-telegram.com/kremlin_prachkas/12838
Алтайским коммунальщикам перестали платить зарплату Следственное управление СКР по Алтайскому краю совместно с краевой прокуратурой инициировало проверку по информации, размещенной в СМИ, о том, что на предприятии "Жилкомсервис" в Поспелихинском районе два месяца не выплачивается заработная плата сотрудникам. ЧИТАТЬ ДАЛЕЕ В ИСТОЧНИКЕ https://www.group-telegram.com/kremlin_prachkas/12838
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from us
