السلام عليكم .. للنساء فقط.. معنا قروب لحفظ القرآن الكريم واتقانه بمساعدة استاذه معها اجازة بالقرآن وتعليم الاحكام ايضاً بأعطاء دروس اسبوعيه.. اللي تحب الانضمام تجيني خاص على هذا الرابط 👇👇 عشان اضيفها للقروب @Omyhyaty
السلام عليكم .. للنساء فقط.. معنا قروب لحفظ القرآن الكريم واتقانه بمساعدة استاذه معها اجازة بالقرآن وتعليم الاحكام ايضاً بأعطاء دروس اسبوعيه.. اللي تحب الانضمام تجيني خاص على هذا الرابط 👇👇 عشان اضيفها للقروب @Omyhyaty
BY لا مستحيــل مَــع الله
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from us
