Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8424 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 ИА «Банкфакс» | Telegram Webview: bankfax_official/13924 -
26 сентября политтехнолог Константин Лукин провел круглый стол с политиками Алтайского края на тему минувших выборов и положения партий в России. Дискуссия не привлекла внимание крупных политических деятелей регионального уровня, вероятно, в силу того, что в этом году в крае не было больших избирательных кампаний.
26 сентября политтехнолог Константин Лукин провел круглый стол с политиками Алтайского края на тему минувших выборов и положения партий в России. Дискуссия не привлекла внимание крупных политических деятелей регионального уровня, вероятно, в силу того, что в этом году в крае не было больших избирательных кампаний.
Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from us