🔥🏦Пенсионеры поджигают банкоматы. Кто их провоцирует?
В последние дни появляется все больше сообщений о поджогах, запусках фейерверков и петард в зданиях МФЦ, банках, отделах полиции. Причем здесь Украина?
Отвечаем на вопрос в новом выпуске «Это уже совсем». Подпишитесь.
🔥🏦Пенсионеры поджигают банкоматы. Кто их провоцирует?
В последние дни появляется все больше сообщений о поджогах, запусках фейерверков и петард в зданиях МФЦ, банках, отделах полиции. Причем здесь Украина?
Отвечаем на вопрос в новом выпуске «Это уже совсем». Подпишитесь.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from us
