🇺🇦🤡Украина получает от Запада переносные зенитные ракетные комплексы Stinger времен афганского конфликта 1979-1989 годов - сообщает телекомпания CNN
Как рассказали ей служащие войск противоракетной обороны Украины, они получали от Запада нераспакованные ящики со Stinger, производство которых датировано периодом участия советских войск в войне в Афганистане, то есть были «на десятки лет старше, чем некоторые из солдат» ВСУ.
🇺🇦🤡Украина получает от Запада переносные зенитные ракетные комплексы Stinger времен афганского конфликта 1979-1989 годов - сообщает телекомпания CNN
Как рассказали ей служащие войск противоракетной обороны Украины, они получали от Запада нераспакованные ящики со Stinger, производство которых датировано периодом участия советских войск в войне в Афганистане, то есть были «на десятки лет старше, чем некоторые из солдат» ВСУ.
He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides.
from us
