В Португалии я нашла ликер, который может стать настоящим хитом для любителей паштел-де-ната! Представьте себе: нежный вкус заварного крема, хрустящая корочка... и все это в рюмке! Теперь, чтобы насладиться паштел-де-ната, не обязательно идти в кафе. Достаточно просто открыть бутылочку этого ликера! Но будьте осторожны: этот ликер может быть так же коварен, как и сам десерт!
Один глоток – и вы уже не можете остановиться!
P.S. А вы бы хотели попробовать ликер со вкусом паштел-де-ната?😊
В Португалии я нашла ликер, который может стать настоящим хитом для любителей паштел-де-ната! Представьте себе: нежный вкус заварного крема, хрустящая корочка... и все это в рюмке! Теперь, чтобы насладиться паштел-де-ната, не обязательно идти в кафе. Достаточно просто открыть бутылочку этого ликера! Но будьте осторожны: этот ликер может быть так же коварен, как и сам десерт!
Один глоток – и вы уже не можете остановиться!
P.S. А вы бы хотели попробовать ликер со вкусом паштел-де-ната?😊
Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from us
