Один из зримых, а не каких-то там теоретических итогов работы Центробанка: ипотека превратилась в грабеж. Легализованный и защищенный законом. Банки не виноваты. Не они ставку устанавливают. Такая вот «поддержка СВО» и «вынужденная лояльность» в исполнении ЦБ.
Один из зримых, а не каких-то там теоретических итогов работы Центробанка: ипотека превратилась в грабеж. Легализованный и защищенный законом. Банки не виноваты. Не они ставку устанавливают. Такая вот «поддержка СВО» и «вынужденная лояльность» в исполнении ЦБ.
BY ЕЖ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. That hurt tech stocks. For the past few weeks, the 10-year yield has traded between 1.72% and 2%, as traders moved into the bond for safety when Russia headlines were ugly—and out of it when headlines improved. Now, the yield is touching its pandemic-era high. If the yield breaks above that level, that could signal that it’s on a sustainable path higher. Higher long-dated bond yields make future profits less valuable—and many tech companies are valued on the basis of profits forecast for many years in the future. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from us
