🧪🔬🧬 نهاد ترویجی نانو دانشکده علوم و فناوری نوین دانشگاه رازی با همکاری انجمن علمی دانشجویی زیست فناوری دانشگاه رازی و سایر انجمن های برتربرگزار می نماید:
📝 وبینار تخصصی اصطلاح سطح
مدرس: پروین آسن ( دکترای تخصصی نانوفناوری از دانشگاه صنعتی شریف عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه تخصصی فناوری های نوین آمل)
🧪🔬🧬 نهاد ترویجی نانو دانشکده علوم و فناوری نوین دانشگاه رازی با همکاری انجمن علمی دانشجویی زیست فناوری دانشگاه رازی و سایر انجمن های برتربرگزار می نماید:
📝 وبینار تخصصی اصطلاح سطح
مدرس: پروین آسن ( دکترای تخصصی نانوفناوری از دانشگاه صنعتی شریف عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه تخصصی فناوری های نوین آمل)
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. "Russians are really disconnected from the reality of what happening to their country," Andrey said. "So Telegram has become essential for understanding what's going on to the Russian-speaking world." Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from us
