#на_фронте Выявили и поразили!💥 🫡 Воины-дроноводы группировки войск «Днепр» разобрали опорный пункт ВСУ на правом берегу Днепра.
«На ощупь, по приборам можем долететь туда. А когда долетаешь на тот берег, все видишь и спокойно работаешь», - отметил оператор ударного дрона с позывным «Фанат».
❗️ Расчет работает парой. Первый номер готовит ударный дрон к запуску. Второй в это время производит разведку и находит цель.
#на_фронте Выявили и поразили!💥 🫡 Воины-дроноводы группировки войск «Днепр» разобрали опорный пункт ВСУ на правом берегу Днепра.
«На ощупь, по приборам можем долететь туда. А когда долетаешь на тот берег, все видишь и спокойно работаешь», - отметил оператор ударного дрона с позывным «Фанат».
❗️ Расчет работает парой. Первый номер готовит ударный дрон к запуску. Второй в это время производит разведку и находит цель.
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety.
from us
