🔹 ۱۰ سال است نرخ برق نیروگاه‌ها را تغییر نداده‌اند، طبیعی است هیچ کس حاضر به سرمایه گذاری نیست/ پاسخگو نبودن وزارت نیرو دلیل اصلی خاموشی‌هاست/ از سال ۹۷ وزارت نیرو نیروگاه‌ها را به امان خدا رها کرد.
🔹 ۱۰ سال است نرخ برق نیروگاه‌ها را تغییر نداده‌اند، طبیعی است هیچ کس حاضر به سرمایه گذاری نیست/ پاسخگو نبودن وزارت نیرو دلیل اصلی خاموشی‌هاست/ از سال ۹۷ وزارت نیرو نیروگاه‌ها را به امان خدا رها کرد.
Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from us
