{ إِنَّ اللَّهَ بَالِغُ أَمْرِهِ } أي: لا بد من نفوذ قضائه وقدره، ولكنه { قَدْ جَعَلَ اللَّهُ لِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدْرًا } أي: وقتًا ومقدارًا، لا يتعداه ولا يقصر عنه.
{ إِنَّ اللَّهَ بَالِغُ أَمْرِهِ } أي: لا بد من نفوذ قضائه وقدره، ولكنه { قَدْ جَعَلَ اللَّهُ لِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدْرًا } أي: وقتًا ومقدارًا، لا يتعداه ولا يقصر عنه.
[ تفسير السعدي ]
BY ناس الضحكه🌞🥀💜💜
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. In December 2021, Sebi officials had conducted a search and seizure operation at the premises of certain persons carrying out similar manipulative activities through Telegram channels. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from us
