IMPOSSIBLE CHALLENGE TO MIAW FANBOYS

Supporters of ibn Abd al-Wahhab claim that all Muslims must prioritize studying aqida and the only way to study aqida is to study Kitab al-Tawhid, otherwise their tawhid is not complete and they are in danger of being mushriks.

But what were the Muslim masses studying before Kitab al-Tawhid was written by MIAW in the 1700s?

What aqida book specifically were Muslims supposed to read in order to have sound aqida?

MIAW fanboys will have to admit one of two options. Either

1. There wasn't any such book prior to MIAW, which is why Kitab al-Tawhid was so critical or,

2. They will have to name a particular book.

But neither option is viable for them.

If they admit option 1, that means they admit that all the Muslims prior to MIAW had incomplete understanding of tawhid and MIAW really was the first to understand tawhid and the importance of teaching it to the masses via a book like Kitab al-tawhid. This is actually what MIAW himself and his followers believed, that MIAW was the only one in the world with tawhid and this is why it is necessary to educated the "mushrik" masses with his book. This is, of course, ludicrous.

If they go with option 2, they will have to admit that there is an aqida book written for the masses prior to MIAW, which means Kitab al-Tawhid is not necessary and that other work can be studied instead of Kitab al-Tawhid.

Furthermore, in reality, the aqida books meant to be memorized by the masses that predate MIAW, like Aqida Tahawiyya, are not acceptable as replacements for Kitab al-Tawhid according to MIAW fanboys. This is why option 2 is not viable for them.

So, please tell us MIAW fanboys: Which option are you going with?

Like all my other challenges, most likely they will refuse to choose one of the two options and will just cry and scream with rage. But the fact that they won't name any suitable alternative to Kitab al-Tawhid is proof that they really do believe MIAW was the first person to fully understand tawhid and explain it in a way accessible to the masses. Which is 🤮

Aqida checking Muslims is a bid'a characteristic of the khawarij.

فقد قال ابن سيرين: سؤالُ الرجل أخاه: أمؤمنٌ أنت؟ محنة بدعة، كما يمتحن الخوارج.

Ibn Sirin said: "A man asking his brother, 'Are you a believer?' is a trial and an innovation, just as the Khawarij used to test people."

Salafi sectarians, the neo-khawarij of our time, subject everyone outside their cult to nonstop aqida testing, but they never allow anyone to test their aqida.

For the past 2 months, a bunch of these tards and postal workers have demanded that I "not hide my aqida" and answer their questions.

I'm an honest person with nothing to hide alhamdulillah so I answer their questions. But the testing never ends. It is just a nonstop inquisition so that, if my answers slightly deviate from their cult or can even be misinterpreted to deviate, they can farm new content for videos like "DANIEL'S DEVIANCE EXPOSED" and "DANIEL FALLS INTO KUFR."

But the grift of these charlatans has been exposed by the fact that they refuse to be tested by others.

This is evident from the fact they refuse to accept debate, even when I give them an overwhelming advantage, like 2v1 or even 4v1.

The reason they refuse to debate is partly because they know they'll get destroyed, but also because they know their fellow khawarij cult members will pounce on any mistake or slip up they make in the debate and use it against them endlessly. This is how this cult cannibalizes itself.

Not only do these grifters refuse debate, they also refuse to answer questions. I have posed many questions asking them to clarify their aqida on istighatha, takfir, Hindu temples in the gulf, etc., and they refuse to answer.

The reality is, they know aqida testing is a way to destroy others and they don't want to be destroyed, so they refuse to directly answer any questions.

They are simply following the example of their khariji shaykh Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, who also refused to debate or respond to challenges made against his innovations. He preferred to simply takfir anyone who disagreed with him and then declare jihad against the "apostates," murder them, and take their wealth.

The Salafi sectarian grift with its aqida testing needs to be collectively thrown in the trash as it is pure kharijism.

Ibn Sirin said: "A man asking his brother, 'Are you a believer?' is a trial and an innovation, just as the Khawarij used to test people."

When Imam Bukhari entered Nishapur, some people tested him with the issue of whether the Qur'an is created or not. Bukhari responded: "The Qur'an is the speech of Allah, uncreated, and the actions of the servants are created. Testing people is an innovation."

These sectarians larp as orthodox Sunnis. They deceive Sunnis because people mistakenly assume that the more exacting you are on theological matters, the more orthodox you are. But this is false. The ulama of Ahl al-Sunna have universally condemned delving into the secondary and tertiary theological debates, especially in order to test lay Muslims. In reality, these sectarians are no more Sunni than the khawarij.

Notice also how they don't test people on actually relevant issues affecting the Iman and Islam of many Muslims:

1. What do you say about erosion of hijab?

2. What do you say about LGBT?

3. What do you say about secularization of Muslim societies?

4. What do you say about abolishing hudud and other provisions of the Sharia?

They don't test on these issues because

1. Most ulama are on the right side of these issues

2. Asking about these issues gets them on the wrong side of the Gulf rulers, who they depend on to survive

So testing people on these issues doesn't serve the intended purpose, which is to attack and destroy anyone who is not under their boot.

Instead they test you on: what is the only correct understanding of Allah's hand and is istighatha shirk akbar and other tertiary matters that have zero consequence for 99.99999% of Muslims.

No more TikTok in the US 🤣
Just more proof of how powerless and victimized the Jewish community is.

How the followers of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab HOAX fake books on Salafi creed: The case of al-Barbahari's Sharh al-Sunna

Many of the followers of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab are not truthful, nor do they preserve the creed of the early Salaf.

Rather, some of them are some of the biggest liars on earth when they talk about matters of creed and the early Salaf.

One of the best examples is a mass hoax they have perpetrated since the 1980s with aid from the Saudi government.

This hoax involves spreading the text Sharh al-Sunna which they attribute to the Hanbali authority al-Barbahari (867-941 CE).

They falsely claim that this text was regarded as important and widely studied in the past.

In reality, the book was studied by no one in the past, and was actually written by Ghulam Khalil (d.888 CE).

This is well established in academic circles (see the linked book below). Ghulam Khalil was an ignorant popular preacher, who gained infamy as a known liar and hadith fabricator.

In reality, much of what some of these loud followers of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab claim are nothing but egregious lies and hoaxes, that are only believed by the most ignorant people.

- They lie about and conceal the actual takfiri khariji teachings of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab (which I will be exposing soon in an upcoming video inshaAllah),

- They lie about the actual teachings of Ibn Hanbal (who did not consider invoking angels and jinn to be shirk).

- They lie about the actual teachings of Ibn Taymiyya (who held views similar to Ibn Hanbal),

- They blatantly misrepresent and conceal the contents of the works of Abdullah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Harb al-Kirmani (and pretend to have studied these books).

-And if all of that is not enough, they simply outright hoax texts like al-Barbahari's Sharh al-Sunna.

Not only do these fools fabricate lies about the Salaf, the Sunna, and al-Barbahari - most are too stupid to actually read the contents of the texts they are fabricating.

Anyone who reads the contents of the alleged text of Barabahari sees that the author is a raving arrogant ignoramus like Ibn Abd al-Wahhab - the latter of which claimed he discovered tawhid, claimed he was the only one who knew it in his age, and then takfired the entire world.

Indeed the reason why the hoaxed text of al-Barbahari appeals to the followers of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab is because the author likewise appears to be a raving arrogant ignoramus.

If you want a window into the mind of a follower of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, look at the following ridiculous quotes for Sharh al-Sunnah.

In these quotes, the author claims to have an infallible and absolute knowledge of Islam, such that whoever has the slightest disagreement with EVEN A SINGLE LETTER is to be judged a deviant or kafir.

The author explicitly claims that all Muslims have an obligation to accept every word that he says.

In this way, the author speaks in the same way as Ibn Abd al-Wahhab and Rabi bin Hadi al-Madkhali.

The author says:

"Whoever acknowledges what is in this book, believes in it, takes it as an example to follow, does not doubt a single letter of it, and does not reject even one letter, is a follower of the Sunnah and the Jama‘ah—complete in his adherence to the Sunnah. But whoever rejects even a single letter from this book, doubts any part of it, or hesitates, is a person of desires [i.e., heretics] (ahl al-hawa).

فمن أقر بما في هذا الكتاب وآمن به واتخذه إماما، ولم يشك في حرف منه، ولم يجحد حرفا واحدا، فهو صاحب سنة وجماعة، كامل، قد كملت فيه السنة، ومن جحد حرفا مما في هذا الكتاب، أو شك [في حرف منه أو شك فيه] أو وقف فهو صاحب هوى. ومن جحد أو شك في حرف من القرآن، أو في شيء جاء عن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم، لقي الله تعالى مكذبا، فاتق الله واحذر وتعاهد إيمانك.

“Everything I have described to you in this book is from Allah, from the Messenger of Allah ﷺ from his Companions, from the Followers (Tabi'un), and from the third to the fourth generation. So fear Allah, O servant of Allah, and adhere to belief, submission, delegation [and contentment] with what is in this book.

Do not conceal this book from anyone among the people of the Qibla, for perhaps Allah may guide someone confused back from his confusion, or turn an innovator away from his innovation, or guide a misguided person from his misguidance, thereby saving him.

"So fear Allah and hold fast to the original ancient way, which is what I have described to you in this book. May Allah have mercy on a servant and on his parents who reads this book, spreads it, acts upon it, calls to it, and uses it as proof. For it is the religion of Allah and the religion of His Messenger ﷺ. Whoever adopts anything contrary to what is in this book does not truly practice the religion of Allah. He has rejected all of it, just as if a servant believed in everything Allah the Exalted has said but doubted a single letter, he would have rejected everything Allah has said and would be a disbeliever.”

وجميع ما وصفت لك في هذا الكتاب، فهو عن الله، وعن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم، وعن أصحابه وعن التابعين، والقرن الثالث إلى القرن الرابع، فاتق الله يا عبد الله، وعليك بالتصديق والتسليم والتفويض [والرضى] لما في هذا الكتاب، ولا تكتم هذا الكتاب أحدا من أهل القبلة، فعسى يرد الله به [حيرانا] عن حيرته، أو صاحب بدعة من بدعته، أو ضالا عن ضلالته، فينجو به.
فاتق الله، وعليك بالأمر الأول العتيق، وهو ما وصفت لك في هذا الكتاب، فرحم الله عبدا، ورحم والديه قرأ هذا الكتاب، وبثه وعمل به ودعا إليه، واحتج به، فإنه دين الله ودين رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم، فإنه من انتحل شيئا خلاف ما في هذا الكتاب، فإنه ليس يدين لله بدين، وقد رده كله، كما لو أن عبدا آمن بجميع ما قال الله تبارك وتعالى، إلا أنه شك في حرف فقد رد جميع ما قال الله تعالى، وهو كافر، كما أن شهادة أن لا إله إلا الله لا تقبل من صاحبها إلا بصدق النية وخالص اليقين، كذلك لا يقبل الله شيئا
من السنة في ترك بعض، ومن ترك من السنة شيئا فقد ترك السنة كلها.

Keep in mind, my problem with these loud defenders of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab is not simply that they are ignorant, arrogant, or harsh. Rather it is that they are open liars and fabricators who follow the deviant Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, and have declared an open war on the Ahl al-Sunna.

They do all this while raving about their infallible knowledge of Sunna and creed, just like Ghulam Khalil, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, and Rabi bin Hadi al-Madkhali did.