Депутат Думы ХМАО "сломался" прямо во время заседания, сообщает Baza. Он подумал, что микрофон — это микроскоп. Во время выступления коллег Ринат Айсин начал тыкать в микрофон глазами. Сначала левым, потом правым. Что он там высматривал — неизвестно. Возможно, пытался найти смысл своей работы, предположили админы канала Baza. Доктор Комаровский, @dctrkomarovskiy, что там у вас депутаты курят?
Депутат Думы ХМАО "сломался" прямо во время заседания, сообщает Baza. Он подумал, что микрофон — это микроскоп. Во время выступления коллег Ринат Айсин начал тыкать в микрофон глазами. Сначала левым, потом правым. Что он там высматривал — неизвестно. Возможно, пытался найти смысл своей работы, предположили админы канала Baza. Доктор Комаровский, @dctrkomarovskiy, что там у вас депутаты курят?
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from us
