Цього тижня Вісник "Ангарта" завітає з лекторськими читаннями для дружнього козацького руху.
Тема читань - Український монархізм та Козакія. Підніматимуться теми нерозривности традиції явищ та спільної духовности, яку варто плекати, як запоруку здійснення спільного Походу На Схід.
Цього тижня Вісник "Ангарта" завітає з лекторськими читаннями для дружнього козацького руху.
Тема читань - Український монархізм та Козакія. Підніматимуться теми нерозривности традиції явищ та спільної духовности, яку варто плекати, як запоруку здійснення спільного Походу На Схід.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat.
from us
