Владимир Путин мутил бизнеса с агентами ЦРУ США. Получал деньги от них, помогал. Устроил в фирмы ЦРУ друга Виктора Иванова. Ему ЦРУшник с подачи Путина платил оклад. Спуcтя годы Госдед оправдывается. Заявил: "кадровые офицеры" ЦРУ вообще контролили правительство РФ.
У Владимира кроме лобзаний с ЦРУ есть проблема. Он туповат. ЦРУ США - гражданское агентство. Там работают шпионы с убийцами без воинских званий. И либо автор "кадровых офицеров" ЦРУ кретин. Либо в семье Путиных забыли русский язык, потому что говорят и думают не на нём.
Владимир Путин мутил бизнеса с агентами ЦРУ США. Получал деньги от них, помогал. Устроил в фирмы ЦРУ друга Виктора Иванова. Ему ЦРУшник с подачи Путина платил оклад. Спуcтя годы Госдед оправдывается. Заявил: "кадровые офицеры" ЦРУ вообще контролили правительство РФ.
У Владимира кроме лобзаний с ЦРУ есть проблема. Он туповат. ЦРУ США - гражданское агентство. Там работают шпионы с убийцами без воинских званий. И либо автор "кадровых офицеров" ЦРУ кретин. Либо в семье Путиных забыли русский язык, потому что говорят и думают не на нём.
BY Инфобомба
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
