Координационный Центр Помощи Новороссии продолжает цикл лекций для тех, кому завтра в армию. На этот раз Алексей Левошко, автор книги «Пособие будущего ополченца», рассказывает простой ликбез про медицинские аптечки. Лекция 2 «За аптечку». https://rutube.ru/video/72d288d0431758521417db6ac547e332/ Благодарим наших коллег по альянсу телеграмм каналов ОПСБ за неоценимую поддержку! Вы можете помочь нашим солдатам через реквизиты КЦПН! Карта Сбербанка: 4276550055595329 Получатель: Майя Владимировна М. Подробные реквизиты здесь.
Координационный Центр Помощи Новороссии продолжает цикл лекций для тех, кому завтра в армию. На этот раз Алексей Левошко, автор книги «Пособие будущего ополченца», рассказывает простой ликбез про медицинские аптечки. Лекция 2 «За аптечку». https://rutube.ru/video/72d288d0431758521417db6ac547e332/ Благодарим наших коллег по альянсу телеграмм каналов ОПСБ за неоценимую поддержку! Вы можете помочь нашим солдатам через реквизиты КЦПН! Карта Сбербанка: 4276550055595329 Получатель: Майя Владимировна М. Подробные реквизиты здесь.
"The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from us
