⭐️Мы до сих пор под большим впечатлением от «Конклава» с Рэйфом Файнсом, а вы? Уже успели посмотреть это кино? Если ещё нет, то наши новые фотокарточки будут для вас вдвойне полезны, ведь они наверняка очень хорошо лишний раз подогреют ваш интерес к данной киноленте!
А узнать ещё больше об этой картине и похожем на него «Еретике» вы можете из нашего недавнего выпуска.
⭐️Мы до сих пор под большим впечатлением от «Конклава» с Рэйфом Файнсом, а вы? Уже успели посмотреть это кино? Если ещё нет, то наши новые фотокарточки будут для вас вдвойне полезны, ведь они наверняка очень хорошо лишний раз подогреют ваш интерес к данной киноленте!
А узнать ещё больше об этой картине и похожем на него «Еретике» вы можете из нашего недавнего выпуска.
The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us