Шабаш сатанистов в Киево-Печерской лавре, продолжение...
Еще одни бесы осквернили русскую православную святыню — компания «Укрпочта».
Теперь Киево-Печерскую лавру можно арендовать под свои желания. Недовласть сионистов и нацистов превратила лавру в бизнес.
Снять шоу, как это делал безумец Клопотенко, стоит 3000 грн/час, профессиональная фотосъемка на территории, «в интерьерах памятников и объектов экспозиций» – 1200 грн/час.
Шабаш сатанистов в Киево-Печерской лавре, продолжение...
Еще одни бесы осквернили русскую православную святыню — компания «Укрпочта».
Теперь Киево-Печерскую лавру можно арендовать под свои желания. Недовласть сионистов и нацистов превратила лавру в бизнес.
Снять шоу, как это делал безумец Клопотенко, стоит 3000 грн/час, профессиональная фотосъемка на территории, «в интерьерах памятников и объектов экспозиций» – 1200 грн/час.
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from us
